Frameworks on Rapid Application Development Methodology – Strengths and Weakness

Software development, unlike house construction, is more adaptable. There are no hard and fast rules here: you can change the design on the fly, add functionality, or even reboot and go in a completely different route without harming the final outcome.

A framework enabling teams to be productive and react to changes swiftly is required for such a method. We’ll view frameworks on rapid application development methodology in this post that permits teams to generate prototypes at a breakneck pace.

What is the Working of RAD Frameworks?

Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a proficient framework for quickly developing software products, iterating regularly based on reviews, and distributing updated editions of those products to the merchandise.

The Rapid Application Development method was created in competition with the prevalent waterfall methodology to software development at the time. Planning and sequential design procedures were the foundations of the waterfall technique. In James Martin’s book Rapid Application Development, the RAD idea was first introduced to the general audience in 1991.

What are the Weakness and Strengths of RAD?

RAD’s strengths include:

•   Getting benefit of the structure of software that is accessible for fast and minimum price iteration, helping businesses to enhance their products swiftly and consistently.

•   Enables teams to disintegrate enormous projects into smaller, specific tasks that can be completed.

•   Users can get functioning items in a shorter period of time.

RAD’s weaknesses include:

•   Requires a highly competent development team and product engineers

•   Needs customer participation at every level of the project

 •  Doesn’t function best with huge projects

Why Should I Use Rapid Application Development?

A team that is both comfortable with the dynamic mentality and has a modest project to carry out, as well as clients who are prepared to become a part of the whole development plan, can profit greatly from the RAD strategy.

However, there are a few instances where RAD may not be the optimal framework. For instance, if your organization has to launch a huge software development project and doesn’t have many competent engineers and designers on board, or if you’re not confident you can gain a pledge from your customers to participate deeply in the iterative process and provide you with reviews. RAD may not be appropriate for your team in either of these cases.

Final Verdict:

The frameworks on rapid application development methodology are an excellent substitute for the Waterfall approach, which is more rigid and relies on system planning upfront. You won’t know if your product meets the market’s dynamic and modifying requirements until the examination is done.

If You want to know about what is enterprise application development software? and open-source enterprise web application development Please feel free to contact us and Try wave maker Low code